Skip to content

February 13, 2012


The Marxist Left: Turning America Upside Down (III)

by Kyle Becker

A Foreign Ideology Makes Its Way in America

The United States was exceptional in its founding compared to the states of continental Europe because it had no direct experience of feudalism.  As Alexis de Tocqueville wrote in Democracy in America:

The position of the Americans is therefore quite exceptional, and it may be believed that no democratic people will ever be placed in a similar one. Their strictly Puritanical origin, their exclusively commercial habits, even the country they inhabit, which seems to divert their minds from the pursuit of science, literature, and the arts, the proximity of Europe, which allows them to neglect these pursuits without relapsing into barbarism, a thousand special causes, of which I have only been able to point out the most important, have singularly concurred to fix the mind of the American upon purely practical objects. His passions, his wants, his education, and everything about him seem to unite in drawing the native of the United States earthward; his religion alone bids him turn, from time to time, a transient and distracted glance to heaven. Let us cease, then, to view all democratic nations under the example of the American people.

Americans have always been a practical, industrious, and moral people, more preoccupied with living their own humble lives than pursuing power or some vain dream.  But intellectuals grew frustrated with the tendency of average citizens to ignore grandiose ideas, to suspect abstraction and philosophizing as idle pursuits, and to esteem doers and creators more than academics and technocratic managers.

The left, driven by envy, narcissism, and an ahistorical hatred of the evils of the past could only see America, the national embodiment of capitalism, as a failed system. The country was an incubator of past sins because of its “flawed” Constitution rather than a liberator; as such it was not the standard bearer of an ideal gradually emancipating peoples according to the inherent dictates of the Founders’ philosophy, but a let-down according to the otherworldly standards of utopian socialism.  “We are the ones we’ve been waiting for,” as the Obama campaign once put it.  Because if an ideal articulated by a nation’s founders was leading the world into the light, what room did that leave for the egoistic radicals who sought their own “fair share” of worldly glory?

The left thus began to teach aesthetic critiques of capitalist “society,” twisting the practice of using capital as a way to voluntarily exchange goods and services between people into the source of all evil in the world.  But imagine a world without capital.  What has changed?  Without real capital, a method of protecting, exchanging, and transporting property value, people are at the mercy of the state.  This is the kind of pure power the left secretly craves.


5 Comments Post a comment
  1. Feb 14 2012

    This is my favorite of your series here. I had not thought about it but it is true that America arose because its people were pragmatic and had no history or need of feudalism. This makes Liberals mad because the hard working, innovative Americans saw the intellectual theories of the Progressives as nothing more than thought experiments and relegated them to the fringe.

    This was a great series and I learned a lot from you. I take it you have a degree in Russian studies or just a passion to study this area? Either way, you should write a book on this series.

    • Feb 14 2012

      Thanks for the advice about the book. It is funny you mention that, because I was considering doing just that before I wrote this. Appreciate your eyes on this, and your blog is going great.

      • Evan
        Jun 10 2012

        Lord you are not correct about of USA history. What about greate depression genocide in rich counry ? After which most people become slaves, where was democracy ? Real democracy does not exist nowhere, beacuse if democracy exists it automatically would lead to socialism.

      • Jun 11 2012

        Such a state of affairs would unleash the rifts in societies to culminate in mutually warring factions for control of goods and enslavement of the losers. You presume too much because of such theories as Rousseau’s ideal of the ‘savage noblesse,’ but by nature, before society, before government, man was a savage who tore his enemies apart with his bare hands and blunt objects.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. on the authority of direct experience as distinct from institutional power « JRFibonacci's blog: partnering with reality

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Note: HTML is allowed. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to comments

  • RSS Drudge

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • RSS BigGovernment

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • RSS Reason magazine

  • RSS Counter Jihad Knights

  • RSS Mises Institute

  • RSS BigJournalism

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • RSS Foundation for Economic Education

  • RSS Tenth Amendment Center

  • RSS CATO @ Liberty

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • RSS Newsbusters

  • RSS The UK Libertarian

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • RSS Unified Patriots

  • RSS Common American Journal

  • %d bloggers like this: