Skip to content

December 3, 2011


Do We Already Live in a Fascist World?

by RogueOperator

American conservatives are often thought of by the public at large as kooks or unhinged conspiracy theorists if they believe that Democrats are fascistic in their behavior and mentality. More widely accepted among academics and the hard left is the argument that Republicans are actually fascists, if not American conservatives themselves.

What is needed in order for a broader base of anti-fascist sentiment to develop is a better grounding of what fascism is, the acknowledgment that it is really exists in the world today, and the recognition that the United States is moving in a fascist direction.

A few points to clear up before proceeding. First of all, nationalism is not fascism. This flies in the face of everything today’s academics are taught to believe, because most are internationalists of the “global citizen” variety. Second of all, fascism is not a conservative or left-wing phenomenon, per se; the fascist enterprise can draw on traditional and radical elements to attempt to unify the populace under its control.

A simple and useful definition: Fascism is the drive for the state to unify all aspects of human life: private, social, economic, and political. It matters not if the nation-state engages in this drive, or an international body, or a religious organization.

One of the biggest obstacles in the way of more people appreciating the fascistic operations of governments is the false belief that socialism is the opposite of fascism. For psycho-social reasons stemming from the experience of Nazi Germany, and Stalin’s propaganda propagated through the Comintern that socialism and fascism are opposites, a very convenient pose for someone who ruled like a fascist, this is a very stubborn misconception to eradicate.

The idea is perpetuated by the notion that society is the opposite of economy, and thus the proper way to oppose the state’s constraints on the economy is to act like an unruly, irrational, spontaneously organizing mob that channels its energy in an unlawful and destructive way. This emotional reaction to fascism, transforming otherwise intelligent people into useful idiots of the fascist state, is a sign of misunderstanding of what economy is, and ignorance of the fact that the best way to control the state is for people to control the economy themselves. This requires private property; an informal commune where property is outlawed merely leads to disorder and necessarily vested economic power in the leadership, which employs this power to its own benefit. The inability to comprehend this simple, unavoidable truth is the cause of much unnecessary pain and hardship, along with the delusion that the state will “wither away” if we simply wish it so.

Economic disorder brought back into order through sheer altruism is not the way to oppose the extractive state. It does not cut the puppet master’s strings, it just leaves us limp to control our own destinies, and thus to produce and contribute meaningfully to the lives of those around us. It is not capitalism as a system, but the practice of crony capitalism, that is the problem.

But enough of the preliminaries. The best synopsis of the current situation in regards to fascism is an article “What is Fascism?” written by Lew Rockwell. Although I disagree with the simplistic argument that the U.S. went to the war in the Middle East for oil, a claim brought up later in the text that has since been falsified, the great majority of the text is a heady and accurate summary of where we currently stand, and what our common understanding should be.

Fascism is the system of government that cartelizes the private sector, centrally plans the economy to subsidize producers, exalts the police state as the source of order, denies fundamental rights and liberties to individuals, and makes the executive state the unlimited master of society.

This describes mainstream politics in America today. And not just in America. It’s true in Europe, too. It is so much part of the mainstream that it is hardly noticed any more.

If fascism is invisible to us, it is truly the silent killer. It fastens a huge, violent, lumbering state on the free market that drains its capital and productivity like a deadly parasite on a host. This is why the fascist state has been called the vampire economy. It sucks the economic life out of a nation and brings about a slow death of a once-thriving economy.

Let me just provide a recent example.

The first sets of data from the 2010 US Census are in. The headline story concerned largest increase in poverty in 20 years, and now up to 15 percent. Buried in the report is another fact that has much more profound significance for most people. It concerns median household income in real terms.

What the data have revealed is devastating. Since 1999, median household income has fallen 7.1 percent. Since 1989, median family income is largely flat. And since 1973 and the end of the gold standard, it has hardly risen at all. The great wealth-generating machine that was once America is failing—and falling more since the statistical recession is said to be ended than during it.

No longer can one generation expect to live a better life than the previous one. The fascist economic model has killed what was once called the American dream. And the truth is, of course, even worse than the statistic reveals. You have to consider how many incomes exist within a single household to make up the total income. After World War II, the single-income family became the norm. Then the money was destroyed and American savings were wiped out and the capital base of the economy was devastated.

It was at this point that households began to struggle to stay above water. The year 1985 was the turning point. This was the year that it became more common than not for a household to have two incomes rather than one. Mothers entered the workforce to keep family income floating.

The intellectuals cheered this trend, as if it represented liberation, shouting hosannas that all women everywhere are now added to the tax rolls as valuable contributors to the state’s coffers. The real cause is the rise of fiat money that depreciated the currency, robbed savings, and shoved people into the workforce as taxpayers.

This huge demographic shift essentially bought the American household another 20 years of seeming prosperity, though it is hard to call it that since there was no longer any choice about the matter. If you wanted to keep living the dream, the household could no longer get by on a single income.

Today median family income is only slightly above where it was when Nixon wrecked the dollar, put on price and wage controls, created the EPA, and the whole apparatus of the parasitic welfare-warfare state came to be entrenched and made universal.

The talk in Washington about reform, whether from Democrats or Republicans, is like a bad joke. They talk of small changes, small cuts, commissions they will establish, curbs they
will make in ten years. It is all white noise. None of this will fix the problem. Not even close.

The problem is more fundamental. It is the quality of the money. It is the very existence of 10,000 regulatory agencies. It is the whole assumption that you have to pay the state for the privilege to work. It is the presumption that the government must manage every aspect of the capitalist economic order. In short, it is the total state that is the problem, and the suffering and decline will continue so long as the total state exists.

Do yourself a favor and read the rest here.

4 Comments Post a comment
  1. loopyloo305
    Dec 3 2011

    Excellent post RO! This is the very reason that we need to listen to what Ron Paul is saying about the FED! It is time to get rid of it, it was a bad idea to start with. I don’t agree with Paul on everything, but on this he is right. I was listening to a podcast of Lew Rockwell this morning on a recent interview with Celente, it is scary how much that we don’t know and how much that we seem to be living in two separate worlds almost. It is as if, there are separate layers, alternate universes almost. If things can’t be changed we will be living in a society where the government has to okay every move you make. The worst thing is not enough people see it, and there may not be enough time to change it!

    • Dec 3 2011

      I’ve heard of this Lew Rockwell podcast, and only ran into it once and it was on a somewhat tangential subject. I need to get more into the loop of what he is saying nowadays. This newsletter article was excellent, and contained a lot of unconventional wisdom about what is going on.

      This newsletter did much to push me more into Ron Paul’s camp. I don’t completely agree with his foreign policy vision, however, his position is a strong dose of medicine to a system that is out of control. I think he is too old and appears to feeble to become president, the American electorate being a shallow and fickle bunch (witness Obama), but I think Rand Paul has some potential. I am irritated at Rubio for supporting the NDAA, but Paul opposed it.

      • loopyloo305
        Dec 3 2011

        His foreign policy is the major reason I would have difficulty supporting him. His age is a factor but if he had the right running mate, I would have to seriously consider him. I was a fan of him in 2008 and truly think that he would have been a much better choice than McCain. I think he really scares all the mainstream people on both sides. I wouldn’t even mind if we didn’t support anyone with foreign aid, I love Israel, but they don’t really need our money as long as we supported them everywhere else.
        It is so disappointing to really like someone like Rubio and then have them do something so wrong, but I am at a loss on who to really support. I am re-evaluating all of them, but I know that I can not support Romney. I am just going to have to wait and watch each of them.
        On Lew Rockwell, the first poscast I got was included in a post by someone. Have since subscribed to the wesite and am in the process of listening to him. I heard Celente on Alex Jones right after the incident with them taking the money from his account.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. A Portfolio of Companies Tied to Obama I won’t Invest In « News You May Have Missed

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Note: HTML is allowed. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to comments

%d bloggers like this: