Skip to content

February 8, 2012

1

Obamacare’s Anti-Catholic Provision is Pure Marxist-Leninism

by rogueoperator

The Obamacare provision forcing all healthcare providers to provide contraception services, including the “morning-after pill,” is causing a firestorm in religious communities and particularly, in the Catholic Church. Numerous churches have drafted letters of protest, and are working in concert to oppose the president.  Many have refused to comply with the unconstitutional law, which is the right approach.

It is clear to students of history that the Obamacare provision is pure Marxist-Leninism, and intended to demoralize Christians. But such an anti-religious policy should not come as a surprise, since Obama was described as a “Marxist-Leninist” by a fellow Marxist classmate who remembered him from Occidental College.

Below is the classmate’s interview with NY radio host Steve Malzberg, including his “Marxist-Leninist” description of Barack Obama.

There are many who believe it would be a spurious or unfounded accusation to claim that the Obamcare provision is anti-religious, let alone “Marxist-Leninist”; and they would counter-argue that the policy has nothing to do with religion per se and everything to do with “women’s rights.” They do not understand the New Left.

Influential Frankfurt School theorists Gyorgy Lukacs and Theodore Adorno, who adopted Marxist doctrine to cultural warfare, expressly advocated anti-Christianity as a means to target the “ideological superstructure” of capitalism and Western Civilization.  Needless to say, anti-Christianity is an aspect of “Cultural Marxism” that explains much of the left, including Barack Obama and the Democrat Party.

But such a patently anti-religious gambit like the Obamacare provision mandating all healthcare providers dispense contraception is a politically risky one, as President Obama is soon to find out.  The administration has already taken counter-measures, such as forbidding Catholic military chaplains from speaking about the issue.  But that may not help him, as Protestants, Evangelicals, and other Christians could soon rally to the Catholics’ side to prevent a “first they came for” series of events from unfolding in this country.

One of the only spontaneous uprisings of the early twentieth century to help overthrow a communist regime came in Hungary in 1919. Beset by invading armies led by Romania, the Christian peasants revolted against the Hungarian government, thereby severely weakening it. The reason for the revolt was due largely to the hyper-sexualized education curriculum instated by Minister of Culture Gyorgy Lukacs. As Raymond Raehn put it in his article, “The Roots of Political Correctness“:

When he became Deputy Commissar for Culture in the Bolshevik Bela Kun regime in Hungary in 1919, Lukacs launched what became known as “Cultural Terrorism.” As part of this terrorism he instituted a radical sex education program in Hungarian schools. Hungarian children were instructed in free love, sexual intercourse, the archaic nature of middle-class family codes, the out-datedness of monogamy, and the irrelevance of religion, which deprives man of all pleasures. Women, too, were called to rebel against the sexual mores of the time. Lukacs’s campaign of “Cultural Terrorism” was a precursor to what Political Correctness would later bring to American schools.

But Hungary was far from the worst communist aggressor against religion; that mantle goes to the Soviet Union, and includes the actions of Comrade Lenin. According to Barack Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model by David Horowitz, Vladimir Lenin  destroyed 100,000 churches in what became the Soviet Union (20).

Barack Obama cannot be compared to the communist Bela Kun or Vladimir Lenin, but he also does not have unchecked power.  Despite this caveat, Obama has already committed his fair share of outrages, neatly buried by a complicit media that would make Pravda blush.

One might recall, for example, Obama’s tapping of “safe schools” czar Kevin Jennings.  (Don’t you feel safer already?) The GLSEN (Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network) representative was known not just for his advocacy of homosexuality, but for his sanctioning of what can only be described as “child pornography” in the classroom.

This appointment was no accident, either.  The homosexual and sexual perversion agenda is meant to destroy Christianity, since it is a faith that directly contradicts Marxism and is opposed to totalitarian state control.

We can expect to see collectivism continue to trample on individual rights and The Constitution in the years to come, especially if President Obama, or those who tolerate his left-wing policies, are returned to power.  “Cultural Terrorism” is not something that is beyond the Democrat Party, which has shown itself to be thoroughly immoral and shameless.

About these ads
1 Comment Post a comment
  1. Dawn Shevlin
    Feb 10 2012

    This is very well written Kyle. For me, I think this 2000+ page law was pre-written. Sitting there waiting for the right guy to come along an implement it. Because there is no way they wrote this thing in the time of trying to pass it or in the 1st year and a half of this admin. No way. It is too cleverly written and we are over one year into it’s passage already and STILL it is being deciphered and not completely read through. This was planned. No doubt in my mind.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Note: HTML is allowed. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to comments

%d bloggers like this: